Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Enjolras in Adaptations


In both the musical and movie adaptations (including the recent Tom Hooper movie, which I've already seen a shameful number of times), Enjolras is a different character than he is in the book.

Friendship with Marius

Our very first introduction to Enjolras in several  adaptations is a passionate speech in a street, usually somewhere near General Lamarque's house. However, Enjolras is pretty much ALWAYS accompanied by Marius up on the platform. Which really surprised me because in the book, Marius disagrees with the Friends of the ABC because he's a Bonapartist (like his father) clashing with Republican idealists like Enjolras. 
Most  of the adaptations ignore the whole plot with Marius's father fighting with Napoleon and being saved by M. Thenandier, so for the sake of making the adaptation under 3 hours, I can understand them making Marius just another student revolutionary. 

However, I completely don't understand how the adaptations justify the friendship between Enjolras and Marius. Marius, in a way, is like Grantaire: distracted from the revolution (Marius by Cosette and Grantaire by alcohol). Although the other students have mistresses, none of them are consumed with them as Marius is. Although Marius has more of the passion for fighting than Grantaire, I still think that the pure-hearted, idealistic Enjolras would at least have some contention with Marius. In the musical, Enjolras gives Marius a gentle scolding:--"Marius, you're no longer a child" and "who cares about you're lonely soul; we strive towards a larger goal"--but then doesn't at all treat Marius with even a little of the disdain with which he treats Grantaire.
That's why it makes sense that Courfeyrac is Marius's closest friend in the Friends of the ABC in the book. 

"Drink with Me"

Another thing about the musical that bothers me is the song "Drink with Me." Victor Hugo specifically says that Enjolras forbid everyone at the barricade from drinking, and a song all about drinking just doesn't fit. Only right before the final battle does Enjolras allow each man a ration of brandy. 

Waving the flag

In the musical, Enjolras is killed valiantly waving the red flag of rebellion on top of the barricade in the final battle. In the book, this is what happens to Father Mabeuf, the older botanist, after the first volleys. Enjolras's reverence for the sacrifice of the old man in the novel shows such a compassionate side of him outside of his tough, sending-women-running-with-a-single-glance exterior. Enjolras hoists Mabeuf's bloodied jacket as a flag of the revolt, in essence saying "For this man, we are fighting." Which leads to another interesting point--Father Mabeuf was poor. Slowly but surely, he had to sell away everything he had, even his most prized possessions, not unlike Fantine earlier in the novel. For the poor that are wretched from society, Enjolras fights.
I don't think that anyone can justify making Enjolras die in that way. It says several times in the novel that he protected his body with the barricade, fighting with his mind more than his spirit. 

Paris Rising

In several adaptations, Paris sleeps as the men at the barricade fight. They are told of the lack of fervor by one of the officers in the army. In the novel, however, Paris does show some signs of rebellion--women shooting out windows and people throwing trash off their roofs onto the army below. However, this quickly dies out. Enjolras returns from spying and tells the men that there is no hope. Enjolras's ability to recognize the hopelessness of his very own cause shows that he isn't completely idealistic, a fact that is largely ignored by the adaptations.

Leadership

Enjolras leading the people in rebellion.
He is unequivocally the leader of the Friends of the ABC and on the barricade; what he says is obeyed. But one of the things that is missing from adaptations is the leadership of other members of the Friends of the ABC. They often advise Enjolras or take their own leadership initiative. Enjolras encourages Marius to step into a leadership position in the barricade. In adaptations, I always get a sense that Enjolras is much more cocksure and self-sufficient leader, wheras in the book, he is the leader of a Republic, bowing to the will of the people
He also looses his ability to stratigize in adaptations, making him a weaker leader. Part of his leadership is the fact that he knows who to send where, when to conserve bullets, when to build up the fortress in the Corinth (also, for some reason, adaptations tend to favor the Cafe de Musain), when to close off the last exit with another barricade, when to send those with wives and children home. Adaptations don't have him do any stratigizing besides shouting "Fire!" and "Vive la France!"

Virginity

The fact that his virginity is not emphasized in the adaptations also makes him loose some of his greatness and dedication. His only family is democracy, republicanism, France and humanity. His sole and only focus in on liberty, and by not expressing his virginity, the adaptations are loosing that aspect of him. 

Death

Aaron Tveit as Enjolras in the 2012 screen adaptation.
I've already spoken on how the musical kills the beautiful Enjolras (See Waving the Flag above). In the most recent movie, Enjolras is the very last remaining revolutionary, and is cornered by the guards. Grantaire stumbles to join him and Enjolras proudly holds up a red flag. The shots send Enjolras through a window so that he is hanging upside down, the red flag still proudly waving in his hand. I won't criticize the fact that in the novel, Enjolras remains standing at the wall, his head tilted because I think the flag and the window have the same effect, the same feel as standing, and it was a beautiful death. They didn't do it verbatim Victor Hugo, but having Enjolras literally become the flag of the revolution, facing heaven and the Paris that abandoned him is very, very fitting and well thought out. 
However, I will criticize a few things. One, Grantaire is a character largely ignored by adaptations. His final show of sacrifice, by standing by his idol, Enjolras, doesn't mean much because in the movie, it isn't clear that Grantaire is a cynical drunkard that doesn't care one whit about liberty. If he's just another student revolutionary, then he dying for his cause and it isn't as moving.
Two, the book demonstrates this great bravery and self-sacrifice that the movie ignores. Enjolras fought the entire brigade single-handed as his men rushed to get into the Corinth for protection. He used his gun as a club to fight off an entire barricade of men. Once the soldiers finally get into the Corinth, bloodied from fighting up one single flight of stairs, Enjolras again faces them alone. Then he bravely tells them to execute him, without a blindfold. In the movie, he kind of just runs into the building and is trapped on the second story. If he's going to bravely hold up the red flag of revolution, than make him brave enough to fight the entire brigade. 

1 comment:

  1. Yes! Yes! Yes! Finally someone who understand the true beauty and greatness of Enjolras's character. He so much more than an fearless man leading a damned revolt. He is not an arrogant school-boy shouting against a rotten government. And he is not a deluded idealistic, or a willing martyr.

    He was a very clever man, who was prepared to sacrifice his life fighting for those who coundn't fight. Who knew from the beginning that the most likely outcome was death for him and his friends. Who tried to save as many of his comrades as he could, and chastised many of them against the futility of martyrdom. Who, through the use of his words, gave courage to those he could not save so they would face death bravely. And who believed, from the bottom of his heart, that his fight was the right fight, for all men and women were born equal, and deserved equal opportunity in the course of their life.

    He died convinced that sooner or later, everybody would come to acknowledge this truth. And it has happened, even if it is still a work in progress; universal suffrage is a reality in most countries on Earth, even if humanity is still very far away from being truly equal and free.

    What pissed me off the most, especially in the movie adaptation, it's when the soldiers asked the rebels to lay down their weapons, as if at this point, if they did, their attempt of rebellion against the government and the king would be pardoned, and they all could be back at home in time for dinner.

    This is so ridiculous that results insulting. And it only goes to show Les Amis as a group of excessively young (and unprepared) people who are, indeed, willing to throw away their lifes in a hopeless crusade without truly understanding what they are giving away.

    The truth is that once the Barricades have erupted, and it is made clear that the people of Paris had abandoned them to their fate, there is not an out for them. They had come to far. The only choices are to keep fighting and to die for what they believed in, or to surrender and subject themselves to the mercy of the national guard.

    In the second case, I'd say the best they could hope for would be a lifetime imprisonment, but considering the treatment of the soldiers to poor Jehan Prouvaire (brave Jehan Prouvaire), I'm most inclined to believe that, had the rebels surrendered, they would've been executed in the act (at least a signifivative numer of them would have been).

    In summary, Enjolras didn't chose martyrdom for himself and his friends. He tried to saved as many of them as he could, he couldn't save more because the only way for someone to escape the Barricade was to disguise himself with a National Guard's uniform, and they only had five of those. He went as far as to chastise those who wanted to stay and die, for the cause of the Republic needed alive men and women to further it, not martyrs.

    I won't say I don't enjoy the movie (or the musical) because I do, but the anti-revolutionary vibe is embarrassingly obvious (and very American), and with it comes a terrible distortion of Enjolras character.

    ReplyDelete